Doctors & patients are saying about ''...

" is a great web site for patients, that is unequaled by anything else out there."

Dr. Douglas L. Packer, MD, FHRS, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

"Jill and I put you and your work in our prayers every night. What you do to help people through this [A-Fib] process is really incredible."

Jill and Steve Douglas, East Troy, WI 

“I really appreciate all the information on your website as it allows me to be a better informed patient and to know what questions to ask my EP. 

Faye Spencer, Boise, ID, April 2017

“I think your site has helped a lot of patients.”

Dr. Hugh G. Calkins, MD  Johns Hopkins,
Baltimore, MD

Doctors & patients are saying about 'Beat Your A-Fib'...

"If I had [your book] 10 years ago, it would have saved me 8 years of hell.”

Roy Salmon, Patient, A-Fib Free,
Adelaide, Australia

"This book is incredibly complete and easy-to-understand for anybody. I certainly recommend it for patients who want to know more about atrial fibrillation than what they will learn from doctors...."

Pierre Jaïs, M.D. Professor of Cardiology, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, Bordeaux, France

"Dear Steve, I saw a patient this morning with your book [in hand] and highlights throughout. She loves it and finds it very useful to help her in dealing with atrial fibrillation."

Dr. Wilber Su,
Cavanaugh Heart Center, 
Phoenix, AZ

"...masterful. You managed to combine an encyclopedic compilation of information with the simplicity of presentation that enhances the delivery of the information to the reader. This is not an easy thing to do, but you have been very, very successful at it."

Ira David Levin, heart patient, 
Rome, Italy

"Within the pages of Beat Your A-Fib, Dr. Steve Ryan, PhD, provides a comprehensive guide for persons seeking to find a cure for their Atrial Fibrillation."

Walter Kerwin, MD, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

AF Symposium 2017

New 2017 European A-Fib Stroke Risk Guidelines Changes & No Gender Bias

by Steve S. Ryan, PhD, Jan 19, 2017

Background: The controversy began with the HRS/ACC/AHA committee report, 2014 Guidelines for Management of Patients with Atrial Fibrillation. The rating scale, CHA2DS2-VASc, is used by doctors to assess an A-Fib patient’s risk of stroke. Magically, simply because of her gender, a woman with A-Fib is automatically given one point on the stroke risk scale―no matter how healthy she is otherwise.
Dr. John Camm -

Dr. John Camm

Dr. John Camm from St. George’s Medical Center, London, UK discussed the new 2017 ESC (European) AF Stroke Risk Guidelines (i.e. CHA2DS2-VASc) compared to AF guidelines used around the world.

Gender Bias Reversed: The big news is that in the 2017 ESC Stroke Risk Guidelines for Atrial Fibrillation “gender is no longer an important consideration.”

The previous CHA2DS2-VASc risk scale automatically gave every woman with A-Fib an additional 1 risk point for just being female. Under the new 2017 Guidelines, anticoagulation recommendations are the same for men with 1 point as for women with 2 points. (“Sc” stands for sex i.e. female gender). This is a major change in anticoagulation treatment for women.

Antiplatelet drugs like aspirin are not recommended.

Anticoagulant Therapy: Under the 2017 European Guidelines, the newer NOACs (Novel Oral Anticoagulants) are recommended over the anticoagulant warfarin (Comadin).

In addition, antiplatelet drugs like aspirin are not recommended. The guidelines explicitly state that bleeding risk should be considered.

Decisions previously dictated by the guidelines now read “patient choice”.

Patient’s choice: Another important change for European A-Fib patients is that many decisions previously dictated by the guidelines now read “patient choice.” For example, it’s now a patient/doctor decision to either try different antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation.

What Patients Need To Know

For a further discussion of the gender controversy, see my article, The Controversy Continues: Women, Anticoagulants, CHA2DS2-VASc and Risk of Bleeding

Keep in mind: all anticoagulants are high risk medications. They work by increasing your risk of bleeding.

Why not drop the “Sc”? Removing the bias against women in the 2017 European A-Fib Stroke Risk Guidelines is a welcome change. But, one wonders why they didn’t just drop the extra point for being female? And make the acronym “CHA2DS2-VA” without the “Sc”? it’s still confusing for women and even for their doctors.

For example, why should a man with hypertension be given 1 point on the stroke risk score, while a woman with hypertension is given 2 points? Even if under the new European Guidelines, a man with 1 point is treated the same as a woman with 2 points, does this make any sense? It sounds like the writers of the Guidelines recognize their error and bias against woman (probably influenced by drug companies), but won’t actually change the guidelines so as not to lose face and acknowledge their error.

This change is historically significant. Dr. Camm was one of the principal authors of the original CHA2DS2-VASc guidelines which automatically gave a woman with A-Fib one point on the stroke risk scale.

Return to 2017 AF Symposium reports
If you find any errors on this page, email us. ♥ Last updated: Tuesday, March 7, 2017

Related Posts

Follow Us
facebook - A-Fib.comtwitter - A-Fib.comlinkedin - A-Fib.compinterest - A-Fib.comYouTube: A-Fib Can be Cured! -

We Need You Help be self-supporting-Use our link to Amazon is a
501(c)(3) Nonprofit

Your support is needed. Every donation helps, even just $1.00. top rated by since 2014 

Home | The A-Fib Coach | Help Support | A-Fib News Archive | Tell Us What You think | Press Room | GuideStar Seal | HON certification | Disclosures | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy